Holding the state accountable for rape in prison

The good news here is that some sort of accountability might be the eventual outcome of this story, but the bad news is that (a) it happened at all and (b) that excuses are still being made.

A woman in Upstate New York was serving time for a probation violation in relation to a conviction for unauthorized credit card use (first and foremost, how does such a thing carry a 1 to 4 year prison sentence? **) when she was raped twice by a guard. The guard was already under investigation for raping another inmate, but had not been removed from his duties, reassigned to administrative duties, or even placed under strict supervision – and the investigation was apparently carried out at a snail’s pace. Now the State of New York has been found liable by a judge – how much they will have to pay has not yet been determined.

Props go to the Times-Union Editorial Board for (a) covering the story and (b) calling out the State for its disgraceful failure to fully and quickly investigate and respond to the first claim.

[The court judgment] might have state officials a bit chagrined — or so we’d think. What we’re actually hearing, however, is a more tiresome and more defensive excuse for how the prison system works.

Sorry, but this is the wrong time to hear about how routine the complaints against prison guards are. Or how labor laws make it so hard to suspend corrections officers in cases like this.

What’s so hard about forthrightness, especially now?

An often-made observation here — that to incarcerate someone is to assume responsibility for the safety and health of that person — becomes particularly pertinent.

Check out Just Detention International for more on the scope of sexual assault in prisons and what you can do.

** The guard in this case later admitted to raping the woman and plead guilty. He was sentenced to two months of weekends in jail. I wish I was making this shit up.

Survivors helping survivors

DartHeart, an organization founded by survivors of college sexual assault, offers peer support services for survivors of sexual assault and other traumas. If you are looking for someone to talk to or advice on how to be supportive of a friend, check out their materials.

International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers

International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers was on December 17th. I am sorry that I didn’t write about it before it happened, as there were events around the world that I would have loved to help advertise. Too often clients, employers, and police subject sex workers to violence, and too often little is done to stop it. Attitudes toward sex workers often partake of the same sort of victim-blaming, slut-shaming words and behaviors often faced by sexual assault survivors, as part of a larger set of cultural attitudes that seek to limit women’s equality. SAFER believes that campuses are made safer by resisting violence against sex workers, and we hope that sex workers might be made safer by promoting safer campuses – challenging deeply ingrained cultural attitudes takes work from all sides to chip away, change, and remake our culture.

Effectively supporting sex worker activism can be a complicated challenge from outside such an experience, however – it’s important for me to recognize that my position may be a relatively privileged one and is definitely one without experience in that field. I tend in such cases to look for guidance from voices who have experiences I don’t have, and experiences with sex work can vary greatly. Many people are forced into it, either through coercion or from a lack of other legitimate economic options. Others choose sex work because it provides a better economic option or because they get pleasure from it. How people entered the field may strongly shape their reactions to attempts to end violence against sex workers and to combat human trafficking.

As a case in point, Sex Work Activists, Allies and You (SWAAY), who I found through the Feministe post that tipped me off that I had missed International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers, will be protesting a recent Google Foundation grant to organizations that aim to end human trafficking. While SWAAY recognizes the importance of fighting slavery and coercion, they believe that three of the funded organizations, including the lead partner, take anti-sex worker positions and encourage the criminalization of sex workers. A particular concern for them is that many organizations led by sex workers or former sex workers seem to be having more difficulty accessing funding then those that are promoting solutions from the outside.

At least one of the organizations of concern to SWAAY has partnered with GEMS, however, an organization founded by a woman who is a survivor of commercial sexual exploitation in her teenage years, and an organization whose work I really respect. GEMS does tremendous work to help survivors (largely children and adolescents) of what they term “commercial sexual exploitation” develop educational and employment opportunities and deal with the traumas associated with their lives before and after being exploited.

The complexities of navigating the rhetorics and realities of anti-trafficking work were recently highlighted in a recent, fascinating Bitch article. The author, Emi Koyama, highlights the emphasis in much anti-trafficking work and media coverage on increased policing and decreased investigation of the complex factors of poverty, racism, abuse and homophobia that inform many people’s experience of human trafficking.

While very much recognizing the validity of the concerns raised (as one tiny example, I am totally weirded out by the almost unalleviated use of “victim” in the several anti-trafficking websites I reviewed, GEMS very much excepted), I also am moved by the work that many of these organizations are doing on behalf of people, many of them children, who clearly did not make a choice to become sex workers. Sexual abuse of children is something we definitely need desperately to combat in all its forms, and I think it is very important to separate issues of children and adults in sex work.

I have a lot to learn about sex worker activism and anti-trafficking, and this post is intended to raise issues I’m thinking about, not to reach a conclusion. One point on which I definitely agree with SWAAY is the need to support more organizations led by sex-workers and former sex-workers. SAFER similarly strives to be led by students and recent graduates because we believe that personal experience is a key source of information to guide effective activism.

To take it back to where this post began, look to sex worker and former sex worker activists like GEMS, Sex Workers Outreach Project-USA (organizers of the International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers), and SWAAY to learn from those who have experienced sex work how we might best work to end violence against sex workers. I hope that we can all work together to develop and promote thoughtful, judicious policies, programs, and laws that recognize and prosecute abuse, but also recognize and respect adult choices in situations where a choice was freely made. Certainly, I hope we can all agree that respecting, and not criminalizing, sex workers is the first step we all need to take.

Wisconsin slashes funding for sexual assault services

According to a student op-ed in the Badger Herald, sexual assault services in Wisconsin are being cut 42.5% in 2012. These cuts will affect programs all across the state, including the University of Wisconsin system, which has several state funded prevention and response programs.

Writer Hannah Sleznikow calls out the dangerously short-sighted and infuriating message these cuts send:

This radical slash in funding represents negligent legislating on the part of our state representatives, for it demonstrates a failure to recognize what is in the best interest of the people of Wisconsin. Sexual assault is an issue that adversely affects society as a whole. By not coping with it effectively via funding for essential services to help victims and prevent future occurrences, our state representatives are sending a troubling message that sexual assault is not a matter of utmost concern in Wisconsin.

Since SAFER is a not-for-profit, I’ll avoid commenting on other aspects of the Wisconsin political scene, but thank you, Hannah (apparently, Hannah is the current name of choice for emerging leaders in defending people’s right to be safe from sexual assault), for alerting us all to this latest outrageous budget cutting exercise.

Boston University Takes It Seriously

Coach Jack Parker of Boston University’s hockey team takes sexual assault very seriously. The team’s star center was kicked off the team yesterday and had his scholarship revoked after he was arrested for drunkenly breaking into a woman’s dorm room and forcibly kissing and groping her. According to the Boston Globe, Parker had previously tried to convince the student to get help for his alcohol problem, and warned him that another drinking incident would lead to his dismissal (this was apparently the first time that sexual assault allegations were involved).

I can’t say enough about how impressed I am with Coach Parker and BU. Everything the coach and the university had to say is right on point – their concern is how to best help the survivor and they are clearly committed to conveying a zero tolerance policy for sexual assault. They also make clear that the player’s drinking is a problem because it lowered his internal barriers that might otherwise have kept him from assaulting someone – there was no attempt to blame the victim or move the focus off his unacceptable behavior in any way.

Maybe what I appreciated most was Coach Parker’s ability to put winning on the ice in its relative context:

“My team is very upset,’’ said Parker. “He’s a real good teammate, he’s friends with an awful lot of these guys. He’s well liked. He’s so important to the team from a winning and losing point of view. He’s been our leading goal scorer, he’s been our first-line center, our best penalty killer, a power-play guy, he gets all kinds of ice time.

“All that pales in comparison to the other stuff that’s going on. The way he is gone makes it even worse because now it’s a big hole in the soul of the team, so to speak. We might not recover from that. That type of stuff is all trivial compared to the stuff he’s going to have to recover from and the girl’s going to have to recover from.’’

In an month when we’ve learned more than we could imagine about just how far some colleges will go to protect their sports programs, major kudos to Coach Parker and BU.

Survey Affirms Prevalence of Rape in the U.S.

A major (more than 16,000 participants) study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Justice and the Department of Defense found that almost 1 in 5 American women and 1 in 71 American men have experience a rape or attempted rape in their lifetime, and that the annual number of rapes in the U.S. is estimated at more than 1 million. While these results are not a surprise, and correspond with results found in other studies, it is still valuable to have this level of data gathered in such a thorough, careful study.

You can find the report and the associated press releases on the CDC’s website. I’m adding a link to the sidebar too (under Sexual Assault Statistical Information) so you can find it again when you carefully need to explain to someone for the 300th time that rape is a huge problem in the U.S. and just because no one has told him (or her, but this conversation often happens with hims) about their experiences doesn’t mean that it is not happening.

Take a look too at what the report has to say about the consequences of surviving an assault:

A vast majority of women who said they had been victims of sexual violence, rape or stalking reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, as did about one-third of the men.

Women who had experienced such violence were also more likely to report having asthma, diabetes or irritable bowel syndrome than women who had not. Both men and women who had been assaulted were more likely to report frequent headaches, chronic pain, difficulty sleeping, limitations on activity, and poor physical and mental health.

“We’ve seen this association with chronic health conditions in smaller studies before,” said Lisa James, director of health for Futures Without Violence, a national nonprofit group based in San Francisco that advocates for programs to end violence against women and girls.

“People who grow up with violence adopt coping strategies that can lead to poor health outcomes,” she said. “We know that women in abusive relationships are at increased risk for smoking, for example.”

So maybe now we can start talking a little more seriously about preventing this major public health menace?

h/t to Jezebel, and a major shout-out to the Jezebel commentors, who did a really lovely job of politely but firmly telling the first person to deny these statistics based on his experience just why he was wrong.

UVM Update

The fraternity whose member circulated a survey asking who each respondent would rape has been suspended, and investigations by both the university and the national body of the fraternity are underway. Kudos to the UVM students who drew attention to this outrage, and to the university and the national fraternity for starting prompt investigations. The Burlington Free Press has more, and you can check out what FED UP Vermont is doing to challenge rape culture at UVM (including their already partially successful petition to have the fraternity involved held responsible) on their Facebook page.

Student Suing College Over Lax Security

Sometimes, even committed sexual assault prevention advocates like myself need to be reminded of just why blue light boxes that link directly to the police exist on most college campuses. We know that most assaults are by an acquaintance, and they happen in dorm rooms or off-campus housing far more than they do outside, so the boxes sometimes seem misplaced. Sometimes though, a woman manages to escape from the drunken fellow student who has kidnapped her from her bed, and there is NO STAFF ON DUTY when she yells for help and NO CALL BOX at her dormitory, or his dormitory, or the dormitory where she ran for help, and no one helps her. And then, as she should, she sues her college, Southwestern Oregon Community College, for not having any means to call security in an emergency and not having any staff on duty that night.

Irresistible

For anyone who enjoys a good joke about feminist theory – I’m torn as to whether this one or this one is my favorite. Or maybe this one. Who said feminist theory wasn’t funny? Or sexy…

Did you know?

That the Huffington Post has a high school edition? Neither did I, until this great post by Hannah Weintraub showed up in my Google feed. Thanks, Hannah, for calling out our victim-blaming culture around rape, and for speaking up as a high-school feminist – SAFER is looking forward to working with you and students like you when you get to college!